EDITORIAL INDEPENDENCE & POLITICAL CAVEAT
Transform your smartphone into a tool for journalism.
The Nanak Media Fellowship is the core of USI’s media-network model.
DONATE VIA UPI
 | Please use only the verified payment information published on this website. Before making a contribution through a QR code, check that you are on the official USI website, usofindia.com, which redirects to https://unitedstatesofindia.livezenlife.com/unitedstatesofindia/. 
|
USI IS NON-PARTISAN — NOT VALUE-FREE
United States of India (USI) is a non-partisan, people-oriented, public-interest media initiative.
We are not affiliated with, owned by, or controlled by any political party.
We do not endorse candidates or political parties.
We do not ask our readers or Fellows to vote for a particular party.
We do not believe that journalism should become an extension of electoral politics.
But non-partisan does not mean value-free.
USI has a clearly stated set of public-interest commitments. We are pro-people, pro-woman, attentive to marginalized communities, and committed to examining caste inequality and the experiences of Avarna communities.
We believe that human dignity, equality, freedom, social justice, democratic accountability, institutional independence, and the right of people to tell their own stories are legitimate subjects of public-interest journalism.
These commitments determine what we consider important to investigate and whose voices deserve to be heard.
They do not determine the factual conclusion of a story.
That distinction is fundamental to USI.
WHAT DOES “NON-PARTISAN” MEAN?
For USI, non-partisanship means that our journalism is not determined by loyalty to a political party, candidate, government, opposition group, ideological organization, corporation, donor, or other powerful interest.
USI may criticize a government.
USI may investigate an opposition party.
USI may examine the actions of a corporation.
USI may question a social movement.
USI may report on a religious institution.
USI may investigate an organization whose objectives broadly overlap with USI’s own values.
And USI may also publish information favorable to an institution, party, government, or organization when the evidence warrants it.
Agreement does not earn favorable coverage. Disagreement does not justify unfavorable coverage.
Our editorial standards must apply to everyone.
NON-PARTISAN DOES NOT MEAN POLITICALLY INDIFFERENT
A common misunderstanding of neutrality is that a journalist must stand emotionally or morally nowhere.
USI does not subscribe to that idea.
If a community experiences discrimination, we believe it warrants investigation.
If women face violence or exclusion, that deserves public attention.
If a marginalized community is absent from the public record, that absence itself may deserve investigation.
If a government agency exercises public power, its actions can legitimately be scrutinized.
If a corporation affects the lives or livelihoods of large numbers of people, its conduct can legitimately be investigated.
If a political party makes a claim, that claim can be examined.
Public-interest journalism does not become partisan merely because it examines power or gives visibility to people who have historically received less attention.
Our question is not:
“Which political side does this story help?”
Our first questions are:
What happened?
What evidence exists?
Who is affected?
Who has power?
Whose experience has been overlooked?
What does the evidence show?
USI IS PRO-PEOPLE
“Pro-people” is one of the central values of USI.
By this we mean that the lives, dignity, safety, livelihoods, rights and experiences of ordinary people should matter in public discourse.
People should not be reduced to statistics, vote banks, consumers, beneficiaries, victims or political constituencies.
They are participants in society.
They have knowledge about their own lives.
They have the right to be heard.
This is closely connected with USI’s broader idea of epistemic freedom:
People should have the ability to participate in producing the knowledge that shapes their communities.
USI therefore seeks to create opportunities for people to document their own communities through the Nanak Media Fellowship and the wider USI media network.
But being pro-people does not mean automatically believing every claim made by a member of the public.
We will listen without prejudice and verify without contempt.
A person’s testimony deserves to be heard.
A factual assertion still requires appropriate verification.
USI IS PRO-WOMAN
USI is explicitly pro-woman.
We understand this commitment to mean support for women’s:
- dignity;
- equality;
- safety;
- freedom;
- economic independence;
- political participation;
- access to knowledge;
- freedom from discrimination;
- ability to tell their own stories;
- ability to participate in public life.
Women’s experiences should not be treated as secondary subjects.
At the same time, being pro-woman does not mean that every claim made in the name of women is automatically accepted as fact.
Women, like everyone else, deserve journalism based on evidence, fairness and accountability.
Our commitment to women is a commitment to their equal dignity and agency — not a substitute for editorial verification.
USI also seeks to develop institutional structures in which women have substantial leadership, ownership and decision-making authority.
Our long-term objective is a women-led and women-owned nonprofit institution, subject to the establishment of the appropriate legal and governance structure.
USI AND MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES
USI intends to pay particular attention to communities that have historically had limited access to institutional media and knowledge-producing structures.
This includes, among others:
- Dalits;
- Adivasis and Indigenous communities;
- Bahujan communities;
- marginalized caste groups;
- economically disadvantaged communities;
- linguistic minorities;
- remote and rural communities;
- marginalized workers;
- communities whose experiences are poorly represented in mainstream public discourse.
This does not mean that USI assumes that every member of a marginalized community thinks alike.
Nor does it mean that marginalized people are incapable of being questioned or criticized.
It means something simpler:
Their experiences, knowledge, and perspectives deserve access to the public record.
WHAT DOES USI MEAN BY “AVARNA”?
USI uses the term Avarna as a social and historical framework for discussing communities positioned outside or disadvantaged by traditional varna hierarchies.
Within USI’s vocabulary, the term highlights the historical relationship among caste, social exclusion, access to power, and the production of knowledge.
USI’s interest in Avarna communities is therefore not merely demographic.
It is epistemic.
Who gets to speak?
Who gets believed?
Who gets published?
Who gets represented?
Who gets to interpret society?
Who gets to define what is normal?
Who controls institutions?
These are questions of power.
USI wants to create greater space for communities that have historically had less institutional power to document and interpret their own experiences.
At the same time, USI will not treat either “Avarna” or “Savarna” as a homogeneous political category.
Individuals cannot be reduced to their caste location.
Our journalism should examine structures of caste power without assuming that every individual within a social category has identical beliefs, interests, or political behavior. Savarana are multi-ethnic, multi-cultural, and multi-racial. They hold varied political and class positions. We recognize their liberal positions.
Hence, CRITICIZING CASTE POWER IS NOT AN ATTACK ON INDIVIDUALS belonging to the Savarana caste.
USI intends to investigate caste hierarchy, discrimination, exclusion, privilege and unequal access to institutions.
That may sometimes require examining institutions or social practices associated with dominant caste groups.
Such reporting should distinguish between:
a social structure
and
the individual human beings who exist within that structure.
USI will not use caste identity as a substitute for evidence.
We will not assume that every person belonging to a socially privileged group supports discrimination.
Nor will we assume that every person belonging to a historically marginalized group shares the same political position.
Our subject is power, evidence and lived reality.
THE SAME EDITORIAL STANDARD APPLIES TO EVERYONE
USI may investigate:
- the Union government;
- state governments;
- political parties;
- opposition parties;
- elected representatives;
- courts and public institutions;
- law-enforcement agencies;
- corporations;
- religious organizations;
- caste organizations;
- NGOs;
- activist organizations;
- media organizations;
- universities;
- civil-society institutions;
- USI itself.
No organization receives immunity because it agrees with our values.
No organization becomes a legitimate target merely because it disagrees with us.
The powerful should expect scrutiny.
The marginalized should expect to be heard.
Everyone should expect evidence.
USI DOES NOT PROMISE “BALANCE” AT THE EXPENSE OF TRUTH
USI does not believe that every controversy can be resolved by giving exactly equal space to every position.
Evidence does not always divide neatly into 50–50 proportions.
If credible evidence overwhelmingly supports one factual proposition, presenting an unsupported contrary claim as its equal merely to create the appearance of “balance” can mislead the public.
At the same time, USI will distinguish between:
fact
testimony
allegation
opinion
interpretation
analysis
and
verified evidence.
Readers should be able to understand which is which.
EMIC PERSPECTIVE DOES NOT MEAN UNCRITICAL ACCEPTANCE
USI’s media philosophy emphasizes an emic perspective — understanding social reality from the perspective of the people who experience it.
This is particularly important when reporting on communities that are frequently described by outsiders.
But an emic perspective is not a license to abandon verification.
A community’s account of its experience may reveal something that outsiders have failed to see.
That account should be taken seriously.
It should then be investigated using appropriate evidence.
Therefore:
Emic perspective. Independent verification.
This is one of the foundational principles of USI journalism.
FACT, ANALYSIS AND OPINION
USI will seek to distinguish different forms of published material.
NEWS AND REPORTING
What happened, based on available evidence.
TESTIMONY
What a person or community says happened to them.
ANALYSIS
An evidence-based interpretation of events and their significance.
OPINION
A clearly identified argument or viewpoint.
INVESTIGATION
Reporting that attempts to establish facts that may not otherwise be readily visible.
COMMENTARY
A writer’s interpretation or argument, which should not be mistaken for independently established fact.
Readers should not have to guess whether they are reading a verified report or an author’s interpretation.
OFFICIAL STATEMENTS ARE CLAIMS TOO
USI will not automatically treat a government press release, corporate statement, police statement, political speech, institutional announcement or activist statement as established fact merely because it comes from an authoritative source.
An official statement is evidence of what that institution says.
It may or may not establish what actually happened.
Where appropriate, USI will seek:
- documentary evidence;
- independent sources;
- eyewitness testimony;
- expert analysis;
- publicly available records;
- court documents;
- official data;
- photographs or video;
- other verifiable material.
The appropriate level of verification will depend on the nature of the claim.
THE RIGHT OF RESPONSE
People and institutions criticized in USI reporting should, where reasonably possible, have an opportunity to respond to substantive allegations.
A response does not have to be accepted as true.
But the opportunity to respond is part of fair journalism.
If an institution declines to respond, USI may report that it was approached but did not respond.
Where a response materially changes the factual understanding of a story, the reporting should reflect that.
USI CAN BE WRONG
No journalist, editor, researcher or institution is infallible.
USI can make mistakes.
Our commitment, therefore, is not to claim perfection.
It is to create a culture in which errors can be identified and corrected.
When credible evidence demonstrates that USI has published a factual error, we will seek to:
- correct it;
- acknowledge the correction;
- preserve transparency about what changed;
- avoid silently altering material when the change is substantively important.
Correction is not weakness.
It is part of editorial accountability.
USI’S POLITICAL INDEPENDENCE
USI is not an electoral campaign organization.
We do not endorse candidates.
We do not instruct readers how to vote.
We do not accept political funding in exchange for editorial influence.
We do not promise favorable coverage to political parties.
A political party, candidate or elected representative may be reported on because their actions are relevant to the public interest.
But coverage does not constitute endorsement.
Likewise, criticism of a political party does not automatically constitute support for its opponents.
USI’s loyalty is to its editorial principles, not to an electoral organization.
NO PARTY GETS A PERMANENT ALLY
USI may agree with a political party on one issue and disagree with it on another.
It may support a particular policy objective while criticizing the way a party attempts to achieve it.
It may publish criticism of a government while acknowledging an action that is supported by evidence.
It may publish criticism of an opposition party even when that party shares some of USI’s stated values.
This is normal for an independent publication.
USI does not need a permanent political enemy.
It needs permanent editorial standards.
DONORS DO NOT BUY EDITORIAL INFLUENCE
The same principle applies to financial supporters.
A donor cannot purchase:
- favorable coverage;
- suppression of criticism;
- editorial approval;
- control of an investigation;
- political endorsement;
- preferential publication;
- removal of inconvenient reporting.
This principle is also stated in USI’s Support framework.
Money supports infrastructure. It does not purchase journalism.
Diversified revenue is intended to reduce institutional dependence on any single donor, advertiser, political organization or patron.
ADVERTISERS DO NOT BUY JOURNALISM
USI may eventually generate revenue through advertising, sponsorships, affiliate relationships, digital products, memberships, services and other lawful activities.
Commercial relationships must remain distinct from editorial decisions.
Advertising should be identifiable as advertising.
Sponsored material should be appropriately disclosed.
An advertiser should not have the right to dictate independent editorial coverage merely because it provides financial support.
Revenue must sustain journalism, not control it.
THE FOUNDER IS NOT THE INSTITUTION
USI was founded by Yang Burzhome, an independent researcher, writer, and self-taught cultural anthropologist.
His personal writings, opinions, research interests, or political observations should not automatically be treated as the editorial position of every USI contributor.
USI is intended to develop into an institution capable of functioning independently of its founder.
That means developing:
- distributed leadership;
- editorial safeguards;
- transparent finances;
- documented governance;
- independent accountability;
- succession mechanisms;
- clear separation between personal and institutional views.
The founder may start the institution. The institution must ultimately outlive the founder.
USI WILL ALSO SCRUTINIZE ITSELF
Institutional independence requires self-examination.
USI may make mistakes in:
- editorial judgment;
- verification;
- language;
- interpretation;
- financial administration;
- Fellowship management;
- governance;
- technology;
- communication.
When credible concerns are raised, they should be examined rather than dismissed simply because they are inconvenient.
Readers, Fellows, contributors and supporters should be able to question USI.
A public-interest institution that cannot tolerate scrutiny of itself cannot credibly demand accountability from others.
WHAT USI DOES NOT MEAN BY “PRO-PEOPLE”
Being pro-people does not mean:
- believing every allegation;
- opposing every government;
- supporting every protest;
- defending every activist;
- agreeing with every community leader;
- rejecting every corporation;
- treating every institution as corrupt;
- assuming every marginalized person is right;
- assuming every powerful person is wrong.
It means that people and their interests deserve serious consideration.
Evidence determines factual conclusions.
WHAT USI DOES NOT MEAN BY “PRO-WOMAN”
Being pro-woman does not mean:
- accepting every allegation without verification;
- treating men as inherently responsible for wrongdoing;
- assuming every disagreement is misogyny;
- abandoning due process;
- ignoring evidence that complicates a preferred narrative.
It means that women’s equality, dignity, safety and agency are legitimate public-interest concerns.
Fairness and evidence remain applicable to everyone.
WHAT USI DOES NOT MEAN BY “PRO-AVARNA”
Being attentive to Avarna communities does not mean:
- treating all Savarna individuals as enemies;
- assuming all Avarna individuals share the same political views;
- replacing evidence with caste identity;
- excusing wrongdoing because the accused belongs to a marginalized group;
- turning journalism into caste-based propaganda.
It means recognizing that caste can affect access to power, institutions, representation and knowledge — and that these structures deserve investigation.
USI seeks to challenge exclusion without creating new forms of dehumanization.
OUR EDITORIAL FORMULA
USI’s political and editorial philosophy can therefore be summarized as:
NON-PARTISAN IN POLITICS
No party loyalty.
No candidate endorsement.
No electoral instructions.
PRO-PEOPLE IN PURPOSE
People’s dignity, rights, livelihoods and experiences matter.
PRO-WOMAN IN PRINCIPLE
Women’s equality, dignity, safety and agency matter.
ATTENTIVE TO MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES
Those historically excluded from institutional media deserve meaningful access to the public record.
PRO-AVARNA IN REPRESENTATION
USI seeks to expand the ability of communities disadvantaged by caste structures to tell and interpret their own stories.
INDEPENDENT IN JOURNALISM
Evidence, verification, fairness and editorial judgment remain essential.
OUR COMMITMENT TO THE PUBLIC
USI does not ask readers to trust us because we use the words “independent,” “non-partisan” or “people-powered.”
Trust must be earned through practice.
We therefore aim to demonstrate our independence through:
Evidence before assertion.
Verification before publication where verification is possible.
Context rather than sensationalism.
Right of response.
Corrections when we are wrong.
Transparency about funding.
Separation of editorial and commercial interests.
No political party ownership or editorial control.
Protection of the independence of Fellows.
Respect for the dignity of people we report about.
Willingness to scrutinize institutions — including ourselves.
THE PRINCIPLE THAT GUIDES US
USI does not seek to create a journalism in which everyone is forced to agree.
It seeks to create a public space in which more people can participate in producing knowledge about the society in which they live.
That requires disagreement.
It requires questioning authority.
It requires listening to communities that have been ignored.
It requires investigating powerful institutions.
It requires challenging unsupported claims — including claims made by people with whom we sympathize.
And it requires the intellectual humility to say:
We may be wrong. Show us the evidence.
INDEPENDENCE IS A PRACTICE
USI’s independence cannot be established by a declaration on a webpage.
It must be demonstrated over time.
If we criticize a government, we should be able to explain why.
If we defend a community, we should be able to explain the evidence and principle involved.
If we publish an allegation, we should identify it as an allegation.
If we make an error, we should correct it.
If a donor disagrees with our reporting, our editorial standards should remain unchanged.
If a political party praises our work, that should not make us its ally.
If a political party attacks our work, that should not make it our enemy.
That is what non-partisanship means to USI.
OUR CAVEAT IN ONE SENTENCE
USI is non-partisan but not value-free; pro-people, pro-woman, and attentive to marginalized and Avarna communities, while remaining committed to evidence, verification, fairness, editorial independence, and the right of every subject to be heard.
Listen without prejudice.
Verify without contempt.
Challenge power without becoming its mirror.
Give people a voice without giving up the obligation to seek the truth.
That is the editorial independence USI intends to build.
